// you’re reading...

News Bites

Are Republicans serious about fixing health care?

Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate finance committee, has emerged as one of the harshest critics of what the right likes to call “Obamacare.” After spending the first half of the year working with Democrats to find a bipartisan compromise, Grassley has spent the second half trying to prevent one.

He attacks the bill now being debated on the Senate floor as an indefensible new entitlement. He complains that it expands the deficit, threatens Medicare, and does too little to restrain health care inflation. At a town hall meeting in August, the 76-year-old Iowan played the age card. “There is some fear, because in the House bill, there is counseling for end of life. And from that standpoint, you have every right to fear,” he told an audience in John Wayne’s hometown of Winterset.

One might credit the sincerity, if not the validity, of such concerns were it not for an inconvenient bit of history. Not so long ago, when Republicans controlled the Senate, Grassley was the chief architect of a bill that actually did most of the bad things he now accuses the Democrats of wanting. As chairman of the finance committee, Grassley championed the legislation that created a prescription-drug benefit under Medicare. The contrast between what he and his colleagues said during that debate in 2003 and what they’re saying in 2009 exposes the disingenuousness of their current complaints.

About the Author

News Bites are short one or two paragraph excerpts of external news articles with links to the original source.

Discussion

One comment for “Are Republicans serious about fixing health care?”

  1. Seeing the about face of Grassley in trying to kill something that bears such similarity to something the Republicans tried to create only 6 years ago indicates that the party is really trying to serve its political ends and at the expense of the American people. Were the GOP really trying to ensure adequate reform, they would not have tried so hard to kill everything in August or raised the specter of “Death Panels” when even Republicans were contributing to the discussions on end of life counseling at the time. They would have worked in a bipartisan manner to provide useful input on the bill instead of allowing its content to be defined solely by a single party. In that respect, they have left down their constituents.

    Posted by Wellescent Health Blog | December 12, 2009, 11:11 am

Post a comment

Story Archives