Moving towards war in Syria through sanctions

In his “Texas Straight Talk” weekly report, Ron Paul says that the United States is fast approaching another war in the Middle East, this time with Syria, by placing further sanctions over the rogue nation that the administration has deemed a threat to our national security.

“In Syria we see once again we see how our interventionist policies backfire and make us less secure,” Paul wrote, citing possible ties between al-Qaeda and the Syrian opposition.  This clear presents an interesting question: by promoting war in Syria, are we essentially supporting the very individuals whom we are supposedly fighting against in Iraq?  Even Hillary Clinton asked this question, Paul notes.

“It clearly demonstrates that the United States has no business at all being involved in the Syrian civil war. In the 1980s we supported a resistance movement in Afghanistan that later gave birth to elements of al-Qaeda and the Taliban. When will we learn our lesson and stop intervening in conflicts we don’t truly understand, conflicts that have nothing to do with American national interests?”

Why is government sponsoring sports teams and clubs?

Wednesday, the United States House of Representatives voted to continue funneling $10s of millions of taxpayer dollars in sponsorship of sports teams and clubs after a Democrat-sponsored push to end the funding.  With trillions of dollars in national debt being shouldered by the taxpayer already, I cannot help but remain confused what the House expects out of this baseless and wasteful government spending.

The government throws upwards of $70 million yearly towards sponsorships, including the National Guard NASCAR race car.  The National Guard spends over $21 million every year on these initiatives alone.  Supporters of the spending argue that it helps recruiting, while Democrats believe there is little evidence to tie this spending with any increase in participation in the armed forces.

156 Republicans voted to continue the spending, proving once again that both Democrats and the Republicans are very much a part of the problem of spending, and neither party has a consolidated stronghold over waste and abuse coming from our federal government.